Tonks v. Mullin

70 A. 1102, 75 N.J.L. 942, 46 Vroom 942, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 164
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 2, 1908·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error. The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tonks v. Mullin, 70 A. 1102, 75 N.J.L. 942, 46 Vroom 942, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 164 (N.J. 1908).

70 A. 1102 (Tonks v. Mullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.