Tonic v. Galley

Fourth Circuit

Tonic v. Galley

46 F. App'x 166

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2002·No. No. 02-6969·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Tonic, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its prior order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tonic v. Galley, No. CA-01-853 MJG (D. Md. June 6, 2002). We deny Tonic’s motion for appointment of counsel. We also deny his motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leroy M. Tonic, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its prior order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tonic v. Galley, No. CA-01-853 MJG (D. Md. June 6, 2002). We deny Tonic’s motion for appointment of counsel. We also deny his motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tonic v. Galley, 46 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 166 (Tonic v. Galley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related