Tonic v. Galley
This text of Tonic v. Galley (Tonic v. Galley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6969
LEROY M. TONIC, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JON P. GALLEY, Warden; BRENDA GLAZE, Correctional Officer II; RICHARD GLAZE, Correctional Officer II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01- 853-MJG)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leroy M. Tonic, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Leroy M. Tonic, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying
reconsideration of its prior order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Tonic v. Galley, No. CA-01-853-MJG (D. Md. June 6, 2002).
We deny Tonic’s motion for appointment of counsel. We also deny his
motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tonic v. Galley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonic-v-galley-ca4-2002.