Toni Patrick v. Bold Roofing Co. Inc
This text of 536 S.W.3d 1 (Toni Patrick v. Bold Roofing Co. Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Toni Patrick, and Ap-pellee, Bold Roofing Company, to vacate the trial court’s judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion is granted. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is set aside and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. The motion does not address costs. Accordingly, costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
536 S.W.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toni-patrick-v-bold-roofing-co-inc-texapp-2015.