Toni Patrick v. Bold Roofing Co. Inc

536 S.W.3d 1
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 9, 2015
Docket08-15-00148-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 536 S.W.3d 1 (Toni Patrick v. Bold Roofing Co. Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toni Patrick v. Bold Roofing Co. Inc, 536 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Toni Patrick, and Ap-pellee, Bold Roofing Company, to vacate the trial court’s judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion is granted. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is set aside and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. The motion does not address costs. Accordingly, costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 S.W.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toni-patrick-v-bold-roofing-co-inc-texapp-2015.