Toni McBride v. Michel Moore

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJuly 12, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-02904
StatusUnknown

This text of Toni McBride v. Michel Moore (Toni McBride v. Michel Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toni McBride v. Michel Moore, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 Caleb E. Mason, Esq. (State Bar No. 246653) WERKSMAN JACKSON & QUINN, LLP 2 888 West Sixth Street, Fourth Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017 4 cmason@werksmanjackson.com Telephone: (213) 688-0460 5 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Facsimile: (213) 624-1942 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 Toni McBride 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LAPD OFFICER TONI MCBRIDE, ) Case No.: 2:23-cv-02904-RGK-JPR 13 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE 14 ) ORDER 15 v. ) ) Judge: Hon. R. Gary Klausner 16 CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE; ) Magistrate Judge: Hon. Jean P. Rosenbluth 17 LOS ANGELES POLICE ) 18 D EPARTMENT, ) ) C omplaint Filed: April 20, 2023 19 Defendants. ) 20 ) ) 21 ) 22

23 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO DEFENDANTS AND THEIR 24 ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 25 Plaintiff LAPD Officer Toni McBride (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and 26 Defendants CHIEF OF POLICE MICHAEL MOORE and LOS ANGELES 27 POLICE DEPARTMENT (hereinafter “Defendants”) hereby stipulate, through 28 their respective counsel of record, to the following: 1 1. A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 5 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 7 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 8 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 10 under the applicable legal principles. 11 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 12 The Plaintiff in this matter is a Police Officer in the Los Angeles Police 13 Department. This action is likely to involve the production of personnel files and 14 internal investigation materials, and other administrative materials and similar 15 information. Such materials and information may consist of, among other things, 16 information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 17 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 18 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 19 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality and 20 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 21 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary 22 uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 23 handling at the end of litigation, and serve the ends of justice; a protective order for 24 such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 25 information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 26 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that is has been maintained in 27 a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be 28 part of the public record of this case. 1 C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER 2 SEAL 3 The parties agree that any pleadings, motions, briefs, declarations, 4 stipulations, exhibits or other written submissions to the Court in this litigation 5 which contain or incorporate Confidential Material shall either be redacted as to 6 the Confidential portions, or lodged with an application and/or joint stipulation to 7 file the papers or portion thereof containing Confidential Material, under seal. 8 The parties agree that they will meet and confer regarding the necessity of 9 seeking an order from the Court filing under seal any pleadings, motions, briefs, 10 declarations, stipulations, exhibits or other documents and/or materials at least five 11 (5) days prior to filing any application and/or joint stipulation to file under seal. 12 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 13 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 14 information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must 15 be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission 16 from the court to file material under seal. 17 2. DEFINITIONS 18 2.1 Action: the above-captioned lawsuit of LAPD Officer Toni McBride v. 19 Chief of Police Michel Moore, et al., USDC Case No. 2:23-cv-02904-RKG- 20 JPR. 21 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 22 information or items under this Order. 23 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 24 how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 25 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified 26 above in the Good Cause Statement. 27 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 28 support staff). 1 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 2 items in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 3 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 4 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 5 (including among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), 6 that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in 7 this matter. 8 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 9 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to 10 serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 11 2.8 Final Disposition: when this Action has been fully and completely 12 terminated by way of settlement, dismissal, trial, appeal and/or remand to 13 state court. 14 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. 15 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other 16 outside counsel. 17 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 18 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 19 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 20 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action 21 and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated 22 with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes 23 support staff. 24 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 25 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record 26 (and their support staffs). 27 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 28 Discovery Material in this Action. 1 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 2 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 3 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or 4 medium and their employees and subcontractors. 5 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 6 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 7 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 8 from a Producing Party. 9 3. SCOPE 10 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 11 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 12 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 13 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations or 14 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 15 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 16 trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Rineer v. Collins
27 A. 28 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Toni McBride v. Michel Moore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toni-mcbride-v-michel-moore-cacd-2023.