Toni L. Sigee v. Thomas P. Sigee
This text of Toni L. Sigee v. Thomas P. Sigee (Toni L. Sigee v. Thomas P. Sigee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00335-CV __________________
TONI L. SIGEE, Appellant
V.
THOMAS P. SIGEE, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F-176,384-F __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Toni L. Sigee has appealed the trial court’s October 35, 2021, Military Retired
Pay Division Order. Following the submission of the appeal, the Court determined
that a discrepancy exists between the number of months the parties were married
(based on the trial court’s findings of the dates they were married and divorced) and
the number of months of Thomas P. Sigee’s creditable service in the military.
A court of appeals must not affirm or reverse a judgment if the trial court’s
erroneous action prevents the proper presentation of a case to the court of appeals
1 and the trial court can correct its action. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4(a). We abate the
appeal, and we remand the case to the trial court for the trial court to clarify its order
and enter an order that reflects the correct periods the trial court intended to find
when it originally entered its order.
The trial court may determine the correct dates the parties married and
divorced and the correct number of months the parties were married during Thomas
Sigee’s creditable service and decide whether an amended order or clarifying order
should be entered. The trial court may conduct a hearing, but it is not required to do
so to comply with this Order. Should the trial court conduct a hearing, a reporter’s
record of the hearing must be filed with this Court. A clerk’s record containing the
trial court’s clarifying order shall be filed with the court of appeals by March 9, 2023.
The appeal will be reinstated without further order of this Court when the
supplemental clerk’s record and the supplemental reporter’s record, if any, is filed
with the court of appeals.
ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2023.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Toni L. Sigee v. Thomas P. Sigee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toni-l-sigee-v-thomas-p-sigee-texapp-2023.