Tong, Alan Quan

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 2015
DocketWR-83,861-01
StatusPublished

This text of Tong, Alan Quan (Tong, Alan Quan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tong, Alan Quan, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,861-01

EX PARTE ALAN QUAN TONG, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 12-08-08611-CR(1) IN THE 410TH DISTRICT COURT FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pled guilty, under a plea

agreement, to possessing lysergic acid diethylamide (“LSD”) and was sentenced to 180 days in the

State Jail.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because, after he pled guilty, the evidence

was tested and found not to contain any unlawful substance.1 Although Applicant has discharged

1 According to lab testing, the substance Applicant possessed was 4-iodo-2, 5-dimethoxy -N-[(2-methoxyphenyl) methyl]-benzeneethanamine (“251-NBOMe”). This substance was made unlawful to possess in this State as of September 1, 2015. T EX . H EALTH AN D S AFETY C O D E § 481.1021. Applicant’s arrest and prosecution was in 2012. 2

his sentence, he alleges he is suffering continuing consequences as a result of this conviction. Those

continuing consequences are sufficient to allow this Court to address his claims. Ex parte

Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court

has determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty was not knowing and voluntary. Applicant

is entitled to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 12-08-08611-CR in the 410th District Court

of Montgomery County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of

Montgomery County to answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue

any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 28, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Harrington
310 S.W.3d 452 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tong, Alan Quan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tong-alan-quan-texcrimapp-2015.