Toney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Toney v. State

334 S.W.2d 170, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3120

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 2, 1960

DocketNo, 31523

StatusPublished

This text of 334 S.W.2d 170 (Toney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toney v. State, 334 S.W.2d 170, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3120 (Tex. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is the same character of proceeding as that in Swanson v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 334 S.W.2d 179; an injunction suit or bill of review instituted by the same sureties after the time allowed for appeal or writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

Our holding in Swanson v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 334 S.W.2d 179, this day decided, is controlling.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is the same character of proceeding as that in Swanson v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 334 S.W.2d 179; an injunction suit or bill of review instituted by the same sureties after the time allowed for appeal or writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

Our holding in Swanson v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 334 S.W.2d 179, this day decided, is controlling.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 S.W.2d 170, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toney-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack