Toney v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n
This text of 512 F. App'x 363 (Toney v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Laura Toney appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Toney v. LaSalle Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:11-cv-01686-MBS, 896 F.Supp.2d 455 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2012). We deny Toney’s “Motion to Request Federal Identification,” and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toney-v-lasalle-bank-national-assn-ca4-2013.