Toney v. Chester County Hospital

973 A.2d 415

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toney v. Chester County Hospital. Read the opinion of the Court — 614 Pa. 98 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 3, 2009·Published

Opinion

[416]*416 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2009, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED. The issue, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in finding a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress exists where emotional distress results from the negligent breach of a contractual or fiduciary duty, absent a physical impact or injury.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[416]*416 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2009, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED. The issue, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in finding a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress exists where emotional distress results from the negligent breach of a contractual or fiduciary duty, absent a physical impact or injury.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Toney v. Chester County Hospital, 973 A.2d 415 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 415 (Toney v. Chester County Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.