Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Insurance Co.

158 A.3d 64, 638 Pa. 631, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1990

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 8, 2016

Docket170 WAL 2016 (Granted)

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.3d 64 (Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Insurance Co., 158 A.3d 64, 638 Pa. 631, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1990 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM7UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM7UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.3d 64, 638 Pa. 631, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toner-v-travelers-home-marine-insurance-co-pa-2016.