Tonawanda Valley & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad

33 N.Y. St. Rep. 620

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1890·Published

Opinion

Peckham, J,

The facts are substantially the same in this case as in The Bradford, Eldred & Cuba Railroad Company v. The Same Defendant, and the cases were argued together.

For the reasons given in the other case, the judgment herein should also be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Andrews, Earl, Gray and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Ruger, Oh. J., and Finch, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peckham, J,

The facts are substantially the same in this case as in The Bradford, Eldred & Cuba Railroad Company v. The Same Defendant, and the cases were argued together.

For the reasons given in the other case, the judgment herein should also be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Andrews, Earl, Gray and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Ruger, Oh. J., and Finch, J., dissent.

Tonawanda Valley & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 620 (N.Y. 1890).

Pincite

33 N.Y. St. Rep. 620 (Tonawanda Valley & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.