Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc.

685 So. 2d 967, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 69
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 1996·No. No. 96-82·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that insurer notified insured, by actual notice to insured’s agent, that insured’s policy was about to be can-celled unless insured timely made a missed payment. With several weeks to act, insured nonetheless failed to meet the payment deadline which would have secured coverage. A fire then occurred on insured’s premises. Under these circumstances, we conclude insurer’s actions were not the cause of any harm done to insured. See Keller Indus. v. Bellefonte Ins. Co., 412 So.2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Burns v. Consolidated American Ins. Co., 359 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc., 685 So. 2d 967, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 69 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

685 So. 2d 967 (Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keller Industries, Inc. v. Bellefonte Ins. Co.
412 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Burns v. CONSOL. AM. INS. CO.
359 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)