Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc.

685 So. 2d 967, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 69

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 26, 1996

DocketNo. 96-82

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 967 (Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ton Rand Corp. v. Crowder, Jacobs, Fendig Insurance, Inc., 685 So. 2d 967, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 69 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that insurer notified insured, by actual notice to insured’s agent, that insured’s policy was about to be can-celled unless insured timely made a missed payment. With several weeks to act, insured nonetheless failed to meet the payment deadline which would have secured coverage. A fire then occurred on insured’s premises. Under these circumstances, we conclude insurer’s actions were not the cause of any harm done to insured. See Keller Indus. v. Bellefonte Ins. Co., 412 So.2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Burns v. Consolidated American Ins. Co., 359 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that insurer notified insured, by actual notice to insured’s agent, that insured’s policy was about to be can-celled unless insured timely made a missed payment. With several weeks to act, insured nonetheless failed to meet the payment deadline which would have secured coverage. A fire then occurred on insured’s premises. Under these circumstances, we conclude insurer’s actions were not the cause of any harm done to insured. See Keller Indus. v. Bellefonte Ins. Co., 412 So.2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Burns v. Consolidated American Ins. Co., 359 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 967, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ton-rand-corp-v-crowder-jacobs-fendig-insurance-inc-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack