Toms v. Quitman County

188 S.E. 537, 183 Ga. 391
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1936
DocketNo. 11402
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 537 (Toms v. Quitman County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toms v. Quitman County, 188 S.E. 537, 183 Ga. 391 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. While plaintiff in ejectment may ordinarily recover upon his prior possession, he can not do so where he goes further and shows affirmatively that the title and right of possession is in another. Under this principle, the original petition filed in this case did not state a cause of action in the plaintiff.

2. By amendment to the petition it was sought to recover on the basis of a title acquired by the plaintiff after the suit was filed. The plaintiff can not recover upon a title acquired subsequently to 'the commencement of his action. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrers and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Potts v. McElroy
71 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Heath v. Miller
29 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E. 537, 183 Ga. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toms-v-quitman-county-ga-1936.