Toms v. Quitman County

188 S.E. 537, 183 Ga. 391
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1936·No. No. 11402·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. While plaintiff in ejectment may ordinarily recover upon his prior possession, he can not do so where he goes further and shows affirmatively that the title and right of possession is in another. Under this principle, the original petition filed in this case did not state a cause of action in the plaintiff.

2. By amendment to the petition it was sought to recover on the basis of a title acquired by the plaintiff after the suit was filed. The plaintiff can not recover upon a title acquired subsequently to 'the commencement of his action. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrers and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toms v. Quitman County, 188 S.E. 537, 183 Ga. 391 (Ga. 1936).

188 S.E. 537 (Toms v. Quitman County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Potts v. McElroy
71 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Heath v. Miller
29 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)