Tompkins v. United States

Court of Claims

Tompkins v. United States

52 Ct. Cl. 30, 1917 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 242, 1917 WL 1317

United States Court of Claims·Decided January 8, 1917·No. No. 32829·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This is the case of a lieutenant commander in the Navy claiming additional pay as aid and who served as flag lieutenant and aid under orders from the commander of the United States Pacific Fleet.

Under the decision in the case of Knox v. United States., ante, p. 22, the plaintiff was not legally appointed aid'and was not eligible for such appointment. Therefore, his petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This is the case of a lieutenant commander in the Navy claiming additional pay as aid and who served as flag lieutenant and aid under orders from the commander of the United States Pacific Fleet.

Under the decision in the case of Knox v. United States., ante, p. 22, the plaintiff was not legally appointed aid'and was not eligible for such appointment. Therefore, his petition is dismissed.

Tompkins v. United States, 52 Ct. Cl. 30, 1917 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 242, 1917 WL 1317 (cc 1917).

Pincite

52 Ct. Cl. 30 (Tompkins v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.