Tompkins v. State

610 S.E.2d 646, 271 Ga. App. 671, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 549, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tompkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 Ga. App. 760
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 17, 2005·No. A03A1714·Published

Opinion

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

We previously vacated Steve Tompkins’ convictions for two counts of child molestation and remanded the case for a new trial.1 In that same opinion, we also held that Tompkins had waived the right to contest the sufficiency of the evidence of venue on appeal.2 The Supreme Court has ruled that our holding on the issue of venue was erroneous and that Tompkins’ convictions should have been reversed for this additional reason, directing that on retrial the state must establish venue, as well as the other elements of the crimes charged.3 The opinion of the Supreme Court is hereby made the opinion of this court. Accordingly, Tompkins’ convictions are reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial as directed by the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.

Ruffin, C. J., Andrews, P. J., Blackburn, P. J., Smith, P. J., Barnes, Miller, Ellington, Phipps, Mikell, Adams and Bernes, JJ., concur. [672] Decided February 17, 2005. Murrin & Wallace, Stephen B. Murrin, Michael R. Duponte, Brian Steel, for appellant. Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Amelia G. Pray, Lori Zamberletti-Cheatham, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tompkins v. State, 610 S.E.2d 646, 271 Ga. App. 671, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 549, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).

610 S.E.2d 646 (Tompkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tompkins v. State
595 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Tompkins v. State
607 S.E.2d 891 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)