Tompkins v. Railroad Co.

18 S.E. 893, 40 S.C. 550
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 19, 1893·No. No. 3268·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The appeal in this case was dismissed by the clerk of this court for failure to file return in time. This was a motion by appellant to have the appeal reinstated on affidavits showing that the appellant undertook himself to have the papers prepared for the appeal, and that they were printed in time to have been filed within the time prescribed, but were not so filed because of delay arising from sending them to his attorney by mail to have them properly certified, supposed [551] informality in fche certificate, and its return for correction. The motion to reinstate was refused

December 19, 1893, W. G. Evans, for the motion. J. G. Sheppard and Joseph Ganahl, contra.

pee curiam

the court saying that the showing was insufficient to make it appear that the default in complying with the requirements of the Rule arose from some excusable neglect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tompkins v. Railroad Co., 18 S.E. 893, 40 S.C. 550 (S.C. 1893).

18 S.E. 893 (Tompkins v. Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rabens
60 S.E. 442 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1908)