Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians

515 A.2d 744, 1986 Me. LEXIS 878
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided September 24, 1986·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant’s appeal from the denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of proper service of process is premature. See Garrison v. Finks, 469 A.2d 440 (Me.1983); Hazzard v. West View Golf Club, Inc., 217 A.2d 217, 222 (Me.1966).

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, 515 A.2d 744, 1986 Me. LEXIS 878 (Me. 1986).

515 A.2d 744 (Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.
217 A.2d 217 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1966)
Garrison v. Finks
469 A.2d 440 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)