Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians
515 A.2d 744, 1986 Me. LEXIS 878
This text of 515 A.2d 744 (Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tompkins v. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, 515 A.2d 744, 1986 Me. LEXIS 878 (Me. 1986).
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The defendant’s appeal from the denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of proper service of process is premature. See Garrison v. Finks, 469 A.2d 440 (Me.1983); Hazzard v. West View Golf Club, Inc., 217 A.2d 217, 222 (Me.1966).
The entry is:
Appeal dismissed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.
217 A.2d 217 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1966)
Garrison v. Finks
469 A.2d 440 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
515 A.2d 744, 1986 Me. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tompkins-v-houlton-band-of-maliseet-indians-me-1986.