Tompkins v. First Union National Bank

897 So. 2d 1282, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 172, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 492, 2005 WL 609915
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 17, 2005·No. No. SC03-58·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Tompkins v. First Union National Bank, 833 So.2d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), based on an apparent conflict with Dye v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc., 828 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Upon further consideration, we now conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tompkins v. First Union National Bank, 897 So. 2d 1282, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 172, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 492, 2005 WL 609915 (Fla. 2005).

897 So. 2d 1282 (Tompkins v. First Union National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery v. State
897 So. 2d 1282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)