Tommy Naquin v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.

71 F.3d 512, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35283, 1995 WL 736845
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tommy Naquin v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 F.3d 427
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 13, 1995·No. 94-30480·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

After this panel heard oral argument of the subject case on August 9, 1995, we filed an opinion certifying questions of state law to the Supreme Court of Louisiana. 1 That court, however, declined to accept certification, with Chief Justice Calogero casting the lone vote to accept certification. Refusal to accept certification thus required this court to make an “Erie guess” and decide the case. Before we were able to do so, however, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement which included a request that we dismiss this appeal with prejudice. In light of the foregoing, therefore,

*513 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal be and it is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

1

. Naquin, et al. v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd., et al., 65 F.3d 427 (5th Cir.1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tommy Naquin v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd., 71 F.3d 512, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35283, 1995 WL 736845 (5th Cir. 1995).

71 F.3d 512 (Tommy Naquin v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tommy Naquin v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.
65 F.3d 427 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)