Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34848, 1994 WL 557011

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket93-7212

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1494 (Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General, 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34848, 1994 WL 557011 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Tommy McELVEEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Cameron M. CURRIE, Deputy Attorney General, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 20, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.

Tommy McElveen, appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC; Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McElveen v. Currie, No. CA-92-2010-21AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Tommy McELVEEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Cameron M. CURRIE, Deputy Attorney General, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 20, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.

Tommy McElveen, appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC; Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McElveen v. Currie, No. CA-92-2010-21AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34848, 1994 WL 557011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-mcelveen-v-cameron-m-currie-deputy-attorney--ca4-1994.