Tommy Layton Schmitt v. Petra Ulrike Schmitt
This text of Tommy Layton Schmitt v. Petra Ulrike Schmitt (Tommy Layton Schmitt v. Petra Ulrike Schmitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed March 29, 2019
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-17-00221-CV ____________
TOMMY LAYTON SCHMITT, Appellant
V.
PETRA ULRIKE SCHMITT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-22377
ORDER
The clerk’s record was filed June 13, 2017. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the Original Petition For Enforcement Of Property Division by Contempt filed on April 7, 2016, and the Respondent’s Original Answer, And Counterclaim filed on June 6, 2016. The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before April 5, 2019, containing the Original Petition For Enforcement Of Property Division by Contempt filed on April 7, 2016, and the Respondent’s Original Answer, And Counterclaim filed on June 6, 2016.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tommy Layton Schmitt v. Petra Ulrike Schmitt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-layton-schmitt-v-petra-ulrike-schmitt-texapp-2019.