Tommy L. Parker v. James Howard Jamison, Jr. and Cynthia Phillips-Price
This text of Tommy L. Parker v. James Howard Jamison, Jr. and Cynthia Phillips-Price (Tommy L. Parker v. James Howard Jamison, Jr. and Cynthia Phillips-Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00194-CV
TOMMY L. PARKER, APPELLANT
V.
JAMES HOWARD JAMISON, JR. AND CYNTHIA PHILLIPS-PRICE, APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 72nd District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2024-CV-0170, Honorable John C. Grace, Presiding
August 11, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Tommy L. Parker is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order which prohibits
him from filing new litigation in any Texas court without first obtaining permission from the
local administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.101 (granting
trial courts authority to enter orders prohibiting vexatious litigants from filing new litigation
without permission from the local administrative judge), 11.102 (outlining the procedure
for obtaining permission from a local administrative judge); 11.103 (prohibiting a clerk of
a court from filing a litigation, original proceeding, or appeal by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order without an order from the local administrative judge permitting the
filing). Despite the prefiling order, Parker filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
Final Judgment.
Chapter 11 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code requires courts to dismiss
new actions filed by a vexatious litigant when the litigant fails to file an order from the local
administrative judge permitting the filing of the new action. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE ANN. § 11.1035; Leonard v. Paxton, No. 03-19-00771-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS
3032, at *3–4 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 10, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal,
after notice, because vexatious litigant failed to provide order permitting its filing). By
letter of July 25, 2025, we admonished Parker that this appeal was subject to dismissal
unless he filed an order granting the required permission. In response, Parker submitted
a copy of a letter from the local administrative judge denying his request for permission
to file the appeal.
Because Parker is a vexatious litigant and has failed to file an order from the local
administrate judge granting permission to file this appeal, we dismiss the appeal. See
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035(b).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tommy L. Parker v. James Howard Jamison, Jr. and Cynthia Phillips-Price, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-l-parker-v-james-howard-jamison-jr-and-cynthia-phillips-price-texapp-2025.