Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett

Fourth Circuit

Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett

16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7276, 1994 WL 8113

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 1994

Docket93-7052

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 409 (Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett, 16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7276, 1994 WL 8113 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Tommy GIBBS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
VAN BARNES; Sgt. Everett, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993.
Jan. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Tommy Gibbs, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gibbs v. Barnes, No. CA-93-415 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Tommy GIBBS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
VAN BARNES; Sgt. Everett, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993.
Jan. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Tommy Gibbs, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gibbs v. Barnes, No. CA-93-415 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7276, 1994 WL 8113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-gibbs-v-van-barnes-sgt-everett-ca4-1994.