Tommy G. Products, Inc. v. Meserole Avenue LLC

297 A.D.2d 319, 746 N.Y.2d 268, 746 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7941

Opinion

The Judicial Hearing Officer erred in finding that service was proper since the order to show cause was not served in accordance with the court’s directive that it be personally served upon the “defendant corporation,” in fact a limited liability company (see CPLR 311-a; Limited Liability Company Law § 303; Scharmann’s Inc. v 388 W. Broadway, 258 AD2d 262; cf. [320] CPLR 311 [a] [1]; Lakeside Concrete Corp. v Pine Hollow Bldg. Corp., 104 AD2d 551, 552, affd 65 NY2d 865; see also Jubilee, Inc. v Haslacha, Inc., 270 AD2d 34). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tommy G. Products, Inc. v. Meserole Avenue LLC, 297 A.D.2d 319, 746 N.Y.2d 268, 746 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 319 (Tommy G. Products, Inc. v. Meserole Avenue LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lakeside Concrete Corp. v. Pine Hollow Building Corp.
482 N.E.2d 1225 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Lakeside Concrete Corp. v. Pine Hollow Building Corp.
104 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Monport v. Larson
258 A.D.2d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Jubilee, Inc. v. Haslacha, Inc.
270 A.D.2d 34 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)