Tommy English Bryant v. State of Texas

Fifth Circuit

Tommy English Bryant v. State of Texas

463 F.2d 1095

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 1972

Docket72-1665

StatusPublished

This text of 463 F.2d 1095 (Tommy English Bryant v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tommy English Bryant v. State of Texas, 463 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. In his petition for writ of habeas corpus appellant asserted the following grounds: (1) alleged failure of the state to appoint counsel, and lack of counsel, in criminal causes numbered 5514, 5515, 5516, 5517, and 5518, all entitled State of Texas v. Tommy English Bryant; (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support the district court's finding that appellant was represented by counsel in any of the cases; (3) insufficiency of the evidence to support the district court’s finding of a waiver of the right to counsel in any of the cases ; (4) any waiver was in reliance upon a plea bargain which was not consummated as agreed, thus denying appellant due process under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. In his petition for writ of habeas corpus appellant asserted the following grounds: (1) alleged failure of the state to appoint counsel, and lack of counsel, in criminal causes numbered 5514, 5515, 5516, 5517, and 5518, all entitled State of Texas v. Tommy English Bryant; (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support the district court's finding that appellant was represented by counsel in any of the cases; (3) insufficiency of the evidence to support the district court’s finding of a waiver of the right to counsel in any of the cases ; (4) any waiver was in reliance upon a plea bargain which was not consummated as agreed, thus denying appellant due process under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F.2d 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-english-bryant-v-state-of-texas-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack