Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District, Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District Appeal of David J. Labrec

Fifth Circuit

Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District, Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District Appeal of David J. Labrec

926 F.2d 382, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2927

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1991

Docket89-6251, 90-4505

StatusPublished

This text of 926 F.2d 382 (Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District, Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District Appeal of David J. Labrec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District, Tommie Z. Johnson v. Longview Independent School District Appeal of David J. Labrec, 926 F.2d 382, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2927 (5th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

*383 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before POLITZ, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing filed in cause No. 89-6251 is denied. But, the petition for rehearing filed in cause No. 90-4505 to vacate the imposition of sanctions against Mr. LaBrec is granted.

To justify imposition of sanctions against Mr. LaBrec for seeking attorney’s fees as the prevailing party, the district court would have had to find that Mr. LaBrec knew or reasonably should have known at the time he filed Longview’s motion for attorney’s fees that the plaintiff’s suit was not frivolous or unreasonable.

On reflection, we are persuaded that reasonable minds could differ about whether plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim was frivolous. Although the district court found that racial bias and retaliation for First Amendment free speech played some role in plaintiff’s nonrenewal, the evidence of her incompetence was overwhelming. We therefore conclude that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions on defendant’s counsel, David J. LaBrec, for seeking attorney’s fees as the prevailing party.

Accordingly, the district court’s order imposing Rule 11 sanctions on Mr. LaBrec is

VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*383 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before POLITZ, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing filed in cause No. 89-6251 is denied. But, the petition for rehearing filed in cause No. 90-4505 to vacate the imposition of sanctions against Mr. LaBrec is granted.

To justify imposition of sanctions against Mr. LaBrec for seeking attorney’s fees as the prevailing party, the district court would have had to find that Mr. LaBrec knew or reasonably should have known at the time he filed Longview’s motion for attorney’s fees that the plaintiff’s suit was not frivolous or unreasonable.

On reflection, we are persuaded that reasonable minds could differ about whether plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim was frivolous. Although the district court found that racial bias and retaliation for First Amendment free speech played some role in plaintiff’s nonrenewal, the evidence of her incompetence was overwhelming. We therefore conclude that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions on defendant’s counsel, David J. LaBrec, for seeking attorney’s fees as the prevailing party.

Accordingly, the district court’s order imposing Rule 11 sanctions on Mr. LaBrec is

VACATED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 F.2d 382, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommie-z-johnson-v-longview-independent-school-district-tommie-z-ca5-1991.