Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al.

E.D. California

Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al.

DecidedSeptember 10, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-03180

StatusUnknown

This text of Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al. (Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOMMIE LEE JACKSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-3180-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RICK HILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tommie Lee Jackson (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 1, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did 23 not file objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2025 (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED 4 in full; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 Date: September 9, 2025 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOMMIE LEE JACKSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-3180-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RICK HILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tommie Lee Jackson (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 1, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did 23 not file objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2025 (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED 4 in full; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 Date: September 9, 2025 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tommie Lee Jackson v. Rick Hill, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommie-lee-jackson-v-rick-hill-et-al-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack