Tomlinson v. Van Vecthen

6 How. Pr. 199
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 6 How. Pr. 199 (Tomlinson v. Van Vecthen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tomlinson v. Van Vecthen, 6 How. Pr. 199 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Opinion

Marvin, Justice.

The application is premature. The defendants have twenty days within which to appear and answer, after the expiration of the time prescribed by the order for publication. The service of the summons is not complete, until the expiration of that time {Code, § 137).

I have also held, in cases where the publication of the summons had been ordered, and service of a copy of the summons and complaint had been personally made, out of the state, that the defendant had twenty days to appear and answer, after the [200]*200expiration of the time prescribed in the order for the publication. That such personal service, out of the state, was only equivalent to the publication of the summons and the deposit of a copy of the summons and complaint in the post office (§ 135).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 How. Pr. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomlinson-v-van-vecthen-nysupct-1851.