Tomlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Tomlin v. State

101 S.W.2d 241

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 20, 1937

DocketNo. 18718

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.W.2d 241 (Tomlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tomlin v. State, 101 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with theft of cattle, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

We find in the transcript the verdict of a jury finding appellant guilty and assessing the punishment heretofore indicated. So far as the transcript shows, no judgment was ever entered on the verdict. Neither does it show that sentence was ever pronounced against appellant.

Under the record now before us, it is imperative that the appeal be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with theft of cattle, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

We find in the transcript the verdict of a jury finding appellant guilty and assessing the punishment heretofore indicated. So far as the transcript shows, no judgment was ever entered on the verdict. Neither does it show that sentence was ever pronounced against appellant.

Under the record now before us, it is imperative that the appeal be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.W.2d 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomlin-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.