Tomlin v. State

725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1999 WL 77748
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1340
StatusPublished

This text of 725 So. 2d 466 (Tomlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tomlin v. State, 725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1999 WL 77748 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

ERVIN, J.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Ivan Tomlin’s conviction and sentence.

The record does, however, contain a score-sheet error. Tomlin’s prior conviction for escape from a juvenile facility was designated a violation of section 944.04, Florida Statutes, at offense level 8, earning 19 points. Instead it is a violation of section 944.401, Florida Statutes,1 at offense level 3, earning only 1.6 points. § 921.0012, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1998). Changing this particular score from 19 to 1.6 points drops Tomlin’s final score from 48.6 to 31.2 points. Because this change affects the length of his guidelines sentence, he may challenge the incorrect calculation under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Romano v. State, 718 So.2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, J., CONCURS. BARFIELD, C.J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Romano v. State
718 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1999 WL 77748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomlin-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.