Tomlin v. State

725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1999 WL 77748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1999·No. No. 98-1340·Published

Opinion

ERVIN, J.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Ivan Tomlin’s conviction and sentence.

The record does, however, contain a score-sheet error. Tomlin’s prior conviction for escape from a juvenile facility was designated a violation of section 944.04, Florida Statutes, at offense level 8, earning 19 points. Instead it is a violation of section 944.401, Florida Statutes,1 at offense level 3, earning only 1.6 points. § 921.0012, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1998). Changing this particular score from 19 to 1.6 points drops Tomlin’s final score from 48.6 to 31.2 points. Because this change affects the length of his guidelines sentence, he may challenge the incorrect calculation under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Romano v. State, 718 So.2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, J., CONCURS. BARFIELD, C.J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomlin v. State, 725 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1999 WL 77748 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

725 So. 2d 466 (Tomlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Romano v. State
718 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)