Tomlin v. Mayor of Birmingham

109 Ala. 243
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKELL, G. J.

On an appeal to a superior tribunal from a conviction of a violation of a municipal ordinance, the complaint must distinctly disclose the liability of the defendant; and the liability is disclosed when the complaint, as in the present .case, sets out the ordinance, and avers the act or acts of the- defendant in breach of it. The ordinance is in the alternative ; but the complaint singles out and specifies the alternative the defendaht-is charged with .haying violated. The [245]*245demurrer was properly overruled. Ganaway v. Mayor, 21 Ala. 577; Case v. Mayor, 30 Ala. 538.

The trial was before the court without the intervention of a jury. And in this class of cases it has long been the settled rule not to reverse the judgment unless the decision of the court on the matters-of fact is manifestly wrong. Dane v. Mayor, 36 Ala. 304. We cannot say this of the decision in the present case ; nor can we say that the decision is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence. Manifestly, if the cause had been submitted to a jury, and a verdict rendered, the verdict could not have been set aside as contrary to the evidence .

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomlin v. Mayor of Birmingham, 109 Ala. 243 (Ala. 1895).

109 Ala. 243 (Tomlin v. Mayor of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. City of Dauphne
310 So. 2d 479 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)