Tomlin v. Buccasio
This text of Tomlin v. Buccasio (Tomlin v. Buccasio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-3578 _____________________________
AUTUMN TOMLIN,
Appellant,
v.
NICHOLAS BUCCASIO,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Mark E. Feagle, Judge.
November 8, 2023
PER CURIAM.
Autumn Tomlin challenges the trial court’s parenting plan and the award of attorney fees. We affirm the parenting plan and dismiss the appeal of the attorney fees award. “An award of attorneys’ fees does not become final, and, therefore, appealable until the amount is set by the trial court.” Mills v. Martinez, 909 So. 2d 340 (5th DCA 2005). The trial court granted Nicholas Buccasio’s request for attorney fees and reserved ruling on the amount. This is not yet an appealable, final order.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Autumn Tomlin, pro se, Appellant.
Nicholas Buccasio, pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tomlin v. Buccasio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomlin-v-buccasio-fladistctapp-2023.