Tomich v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tomich v. State

260 S.W.3d 904, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 2008 WL 4051179

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2008·No. ED 90437·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Tomich (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of Movant’s three claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Tomich (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of Movant’s three claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tomich v. State, 260 S.W.3d 904, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1170, 2008 WL 4051179 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 904 (Tomich v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.