Tomfol Owners Corp. v. Parker
This text of Tomfol Owners Corp. v. Parker (Tomfol Owners Corp. v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Robin Parker, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, -and- Nelson Oquendo, "John Doe," "Jane Doe," Respondents-Respondents.
Tenant, as limited by the briefs, appeals from so much
of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michelle D. Schreiber, J.), dated April 28,
2017, which denied tenant's motion for attorneys' fees in a nonpayment summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Order (Michelle D. Schreiber, J.), dated April 28, 2017, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs.
In light of tenant's admitted default in paying maintenance due under the proprietary lease and tender of arrears during the pendency of this nonpayment proceeding, tenant was not entitled to an award of attorneys' fees as the prevailing party, even though the petition was ultimately dismissed due to a defective rent demand (see Matter of Stepping Stones Assoc. v Seymour, 48 AD3d 581, 584 [2008], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 953 [2008]; Ram I v Stuart, 248 AD2d 255, 256 [1998]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: April 23, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tomfol Owners Corp. v. Parker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomfol-owners-corp-v-parker-nyappterm-2018.