Tombeckbee Bank of Mobile v.

U.S. Circuit Court for New York

Tombeckbee Bank of Mobile v.

24 F. Cas. 18

DecidedAugust 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. Cas. 18 (Tombeckbee Bank of Mobile v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tombeckbee Bank of Mobile v., 24 F. Cas. 18 (circtny 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, District Judge,

In charging the jury, instructed them that the plaintiffs, by receiving the principal and interest of the bills of exchange, had, in effect, released all rights to damages; and damages could not be recovered on a bill after the principal and interest had been received by the holder. The jury returned a verdict into court, but, the plaintiffs’ counsel claiming to be called, and not answering to the call, the verdict, which was for the defendants, was not recorded, and the plaintiffs became nonsuited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, District Judge,

In charging the jury, instructed them that the plaintiffs, by receiving the principal and interest of the bills of exchange, had, in effect, released all rights to damages; and damages could not be recovered on a bill after the principal and interest had been received by the holder. The jury returned a verdict into court, but, the plaintiffs’ counsel claiming to be called, and not answering to the call, the verdict, which was for the defendants, was not recorded, and the plaintiffs became nonsuited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 F. Cas. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tombeckbee-bank-of-mobile-v-circtny-1829.