Tomasi v. City of New York

289 A.D.2d 563, 735 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13047

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), entered November 27, 2000 which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed on the law, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

We agree with the appellants that the evidence at trial so preponderated in their favor that the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746; Zhuravenko v Gjelaj, 261 AD2d 399; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). In light of our determination we need not reach the appellants’ remaining contentions. Luciano, J. P., Townes, Crane and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomasi v. City of New York, 289 A.D.2d 563, 735 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 563 (Tomasi v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.
655 N.E.2d 163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Zhuravenko v. Gjelaj
261 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)