Tomas Villasenor v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 3, 2017
Docket05-16-01273-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Tomas Villasenor v. State (Tomas Villasenor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tomas Villasenor v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order entered February 3, 2017

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01272-CR No. 05-16-01273-CR

TOMAS VILLASENOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15-10493-422-F & 15-10494-422-F

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due December 3, 2016. By postcard dated December 6, 2016, we

notified appellant and directed him to file his brief and an extension motion within ten days. On

December 18, 2016, he filed a motion to extend time which we granted, making his brief due

January 19, 2017. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no communication from

appellant.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. The trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant wants to prosecute the appeal, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tomas Villasenor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomas-villasenor-v-state-texapp-2017.