Tomas Popson v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1860

___________________________

Tomas Caesar Popson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

City of Kansas City, Missouri; Richard Smith, individually; Justin Forrest, individually; Nathan Anderson, individually; Kansas City, Missouri Police Department; Mayor Quinton Donald Lucas; Mayor Sylvester “Sly” James; Nathan F. Garrett; Leland Shurin; Don Wagner; Mark Tolbert; Doe-1, Police Officer/Agent; Doe-2; Doe-3; Doe-4; Doe-5; Doe-6; Doe-7; Sgt. Mike Lewis;

Clint Reno; Does 1-50; City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

Submitted: April 21, 2021 Filed: April 27, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this pro se civil rights action, Tomas Popson appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing several defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants. Popson also challenges the district court’s imposition of a restriction on his filings. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2020) (summary judgment standard of review); Waters v. Madson, 921 F.3d 725, 734 (8th Cir. 2019) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review); Bass v. Gen. Motors Corp., 150 F.3d 842, 851 (8th Cir. 1998) (inherent disciplinary power standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.