Tomas F. Pina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tomas F. Pina v. State

200 So. 3d 185, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243, 2016 WL 3570116

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 1, 2016

Docket5D15-928

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 185 (Tomas F. Pina v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tomas F. Pina v. State, 200 So. 3d 185, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243, 2016 WL 3570116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred by relying solely on hearsay evidence to revoke Appellant’s probation. See Crume v. State, 703 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we revei'se the trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation and remand with instructions to reinstate his probation.

REVERSED and REMANDED with Instructions.

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI