Tomas F. Pina v. State
200 So. 3d 185, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243, 2016 WL 3570116
Opinion
ON CONCESSION OF ERROR
The State properly concedes that the trial court erred by relying solely on hearsay evidence to revoke Appellant’s probation. See Crume v. State, 703 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we revei'se the trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation and remand with instructions to reinstate his probation.
REVERSED and REMANDED with Instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tomas F. Pina v. State, 200 So. 3d 185, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243, 2016 WL 3570116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
200 So. 3d 185 (Tomas F. Pina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crume v. State
703 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)