Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza
This text of Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza (Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
TOMAS BRIKSZA, Appellant,
v.
MYRSA BRIKSZA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2328
[May 13, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502025DR000620XXXASB.
Tomas Briksza, Lake Worth, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, inter alia, A.L. v. Dep’t of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” (cleaned up)).
CIKLIN, GERBER and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomas-briksza-v-myrsa-briksza-fladistctapp-2026.