Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 2026·No. 4D2025-2328·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

TOMAS BRIKSZA, Appellant,

v.

MYRSA BRIKSZA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2328

[May 13, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502025DR000620XXXASB.

Tomas Briksza, Lake Worth, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, inter alia, A.L. v. Dep’t of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” (cleaned up)).

CIKLIN, GERBER and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza (Tomas Briksza v. Myrsa Briksza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.L. v. Department of Children & Families
958 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)