Tomanio v. Board of Regents
This text of 343 N.E.2d 755 (Tomanio v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the Board of Regents to waive the examination required by statute was not, as a matter of law, an abuse of discretion. (Education Law, § 6506, subd [5]; § 6554, subd [4]; see, also, Matter of Levi v Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 256 App Div 444, affd 281 NY 627.)
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Taking no part: Judge Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 N.E.2d 755, 38 N.Y.2d 724, 381 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomanio-v-board-of-regents-ny-1975.