Tomanio v. Board of Regents

343 N.E.2d 755, 38 N.Y.2d 724, 381 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2315
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1975·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the Board of Regents to waive the examination required by statute was not, as a matter of law, an abuse of discretion. (Education Law, § 6506, subd [5]; § 6554, subd [4]; see, also, Matter of Levi v Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 256 App Div 444, affd 281 NY 627.)

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Taking no part: Judge Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomanio v. Board of Regents, 343 N.E.2d 755, 38 N.Y.2d 724, 381 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2315 (N.Y. 1975).

343 N.E.2d 755 (Tomanio v. Board of Regents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castelle v. Commissioner of Education
228 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
McDonagh v. Ambach
140 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Karasik v. Board of Regents
130 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Kirchgessner v. Hurlbut
81 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)