Tomack v. Tomack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tomack v. Tomack

24 A.D.2d 847, 263 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3078

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 847 (Tomack v. Tomack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tomack v. Tomack, 24 A.D.2d 847, 263 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on January 27, 1965, fixing support for petitioner’s two infant children in the aggregate sum of $3,000 annually, payable at the rate of $125 semimonthly, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, by increasing the support payments for the two infant children to the aggregate sum of $5,200 annually, payable at the rate of $100 weekly and, as so modified, [848]*848affirmed, without costs and without disbursements to either party. On the record it is our opinion that the support allowance, of $3,000 annually is inadequate and that a fairer allowance is $5,200 annually. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on January 27, 1965, fixing support for petitioner’s two infant children in the aggregate sum of $3,000 annually, payable at the rate of $125 semimonthly, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, by increasing the support payments for the two infant children to the aggregate sum of $5,200 annually, payable at the rate of $100 weekly and, as so modified, [848]*848affirmed, without costs and without disbursements to either party. On the record it is our opinion that the support allowance, of $3,000 annually is inadequate and that a fairer allowance is $5,200 annually. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 847, 263 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomack-v-tomack-nyappdiv-1965.