Tom We Shung v. Brownell

346 U.S. 906, 74 S. Ct. 237, 98 L. Ed. 405, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1386
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 7, 1953·No. No. 241·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.

Mr. Justice Black would re[907] verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tom We Shung v. Brownell, 346 U.S. 906, 74 S. Ct. 237, 98 L. Ed. 405, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1386 (1953).

346 U.S. 906 (Tom We Shung v. Brownell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Le v. Astrue
558 F.3d 1019 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Benoit Brookens v. Dawn White
795 F.2d 178 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Baker v. Ives
294 A.2d 290 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1972)
Morris v. Uhl & Lopez Engineers, Inc.
442 F.2d 1247 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.
345 F.2d 269 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
Firchau v. Diamond National Corporation
345 F.2d 269 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
City of Derby v. Water Resources Commission
172 A.2d 907 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1961)
Thatcher v. City Terrace Cultural Center
181 Cal. App. 2d 433 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
United States Ex Rel. Tom We Shung v. Murff
176 F. Supp. 253 (S.D. New York, 1959)
Print Carter O'Neal v. United States
264 F.2d 809 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Andrew Pitts v. United States
263 F.2d 808 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Daniel J. Donovan v. Esso Shipping Company
259 F.2d 65 (Third Circuit, 1958)