Tom Johns v. the Fox Hall, Ltd AKA Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 16, 2022
Docket01-22-00403-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tom Johns v. the Fox Hall, Ltd AKA Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd (Tom Johns v. the Fox Hall, Ltd AKA Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tom Johns v. the Fox Hall, Ltd AKA Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tom Johns v. The Fox Hall, Ltd aka Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd

Appellate case number: 01-22-00403-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-08163

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Appellee The Fox Hall, Ltd. a/k/a Fox Hall Apartments has filed a “Motion to Require Appellant Tom Johns to file an Appellant’s Brief in Compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.” Fox Hall correctly asserts that Johns’s brief fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 in several respects. Thus, Fox Hall’s motion is granted, and Johns’s brief is stricken because it fails to comply with Rule 38.1 in the following significant respects:

• Johns’s brief does not contain a concise statement of “all issues or points presented for review.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(f). • The brief does not contain a “Statement of Facts,” which “must state concisely and without argument the facts pertinent to the issues or points presented.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g). Importantly, “[t]he statement must be supported by record references.” Id. • The brief fails to include a “Summary of the Argument,” which “must contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief.” The “summary must not merely repeat the issues or points presented for review.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(h). • The “Argument” portion of the brief does not contain “a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i). Accordingly, Johns’s brief is stricken, and he is ordered to file a brief in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k).

Fox Hall’s brief will be due 30 days after Johns’s brief is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower Acting individually

Date: August 16, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tom Johns v. the Fox Hall, Ltd AKA Fox Hall Apartments, Fox Hall Apartments, LLC and Fox Hall, Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tom-johns-v-the-fox-hall-ltd-aka-fox-hall-apartments-fox-hall-texapp-2022.