Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-138-CV
TOM FRANKLIN APPELLANT
V.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL APPELLEE ASSOCIATION ------------
FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
Appellant Tom Franklin filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s “Order to
Proceed with Notice of Foreclosure Sale and Foreclosure Sale.” Because we were
concerned that we did not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we notified Appellant
that his appeal could be dismissed unless he filed a timely response showing
grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant’s response does not show grounds for
continuing the appeal.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Rule of civil procedure 736(8)(A) provides that an order granting or denying
a home equity foreclosure application under rule 736 is not appealable. 2 The order
Appellant seeks to appeal grants the home equity foreclosure application filed by
Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for
want of jurisdiction. 3
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and W ALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: July 15, 2010
2 Tex. R. Civ. P. 736(8)(A); see also McLane v. Wash. Mut. Bank, No. 02- 07-460-CV, 2008 W L 2780665, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort W orth July 17, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.). 3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see also McLane, 2008 W L 2780665, at *1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association (Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.