Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 15, 2010·No. 02-10-00138-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-138-CV

TOM FRANKLIN APPELLANT

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL APPELLEE ASSOCIATION ------------

FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Appellant Tom Franklin filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s “Order to

Proceed with Notice of Foreclosure Sale and Foreclosure Sale.” Because we were

concerned that we did not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we notified Appellant

that his appeal could be dismissed unless he filed a timely response showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant’s response does not show grounds for

continuing the appeal.

1  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Rule of civil procedure 736(8)(A) provides that an order granting or denying

a home equity foreclosure application under rule 736 is not appealable. 2 The order

Appellant seeks to appeal grants the home equity foreclosure application filed by

Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for

want of jurisdiction. 3

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and W ALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 15, 2010

2  Tex. R. Civ. P. 736(8)(A); see also McLane v. Wash. Mut. Bank, No. 02- 07-460-CV, 2008 W L 2780665, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort W orth July 17, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.). 3  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see also McLane, 2008 W L 2780665, at *1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association (Tom Franklin v. U.S. Bank National Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.