Tom Fatjo, Jr. v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tom Fatjo, Jr. v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP

DecidedFebruary 28, 2018

Docket04-17-00566-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Tom Fatjo, Jr. v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP (Tom Fatjo, Jr. v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tom Fatjo, Jr. v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00566-CV

Tom FATJO, Jr., Appellant

v.

ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 15425A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2018

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties

regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI