Tom Dyke and Sibyl Dyke v. Don Jackson and Velna Jackson D/B/A Phophet Investments

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 3, 2006·No. 03-03-00740-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN


═══════════════════════════

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

═══════════════════════════




NO. 03-03-00740-CV




Tom Dyke and Sibyl Dyke, Appellants


v.


Don Jackson and Velna Jackson d/b/a Prophet Investments, Appellees





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN300334, HONORABLE C. W. DUNCAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING



S U P P L E M E N T A L M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



                        We originally issued an opinion and judgment on August 10, 2005. While the cause was pending on rehearing, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss, explaining that they have settled their dispute. Therefore, our original judgment issued August 10, 2005, is withdrawn and the judgment issued this date is substituted in its place. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal, taxing costs to the party that incurred them.

                                                                        __________________________________________

                                                                        David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: March 3, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tom Dyke and Sibyl Dyke v. Don Jackson and Velna Jackson D/B/A Phophet Investments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Tom Dyke and Sibyl Dyke v. Don Jackson and Velna Jackson D/B/A Phophet Investments (Tom Dyke and Sibyl Dyke v. Don Jackson and Velna Jackson D/B/A Phophet Investments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.