Tom Barrow v. Detroit Election Commission
This text of Tom Barrow v. Detroit Election Commission (Tom Barrow v. Detroit Election Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 19, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
147264 & (11) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack TOM BARROW, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 147264 COA: 316695 Wayne CC: 13-007068-AW CITY OF DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION and CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF DETROIT, Defendants, and MICHAEL DUGGAN and MICHAEL DUGGAN FOR MAYOR COMMITTEE, Intervening Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED as moot.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 19, 2013 p0619 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tom Barrow v. Detroit Election Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tom-barrow-v-detroit-election-commission-mich-2013.