Tolver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tolver v. State

72 S.E. 516, 10 Ga. App. 33, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 629

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1911

Docket3441

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 S.E. 516 (Tolver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tolver v. State, 72 S.E. 516, 10 Ga. App. 33, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to corroborate the confession and authorize the verdict of guilty.

2. In a prosecution for simple larceny, where it appears that the goods alleged to have been stolen were sold, and thus had some value, it is [34]*34unnecessary to prove tlie price paid or the exact quantity. Erom legally admitted evidence it appears that the goods claimed to have been stolen had some value. The fact that other evidence as to value was illegally admitted will not, in the absence of other error, authorize a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Decided November 7, 1911.

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan.

April 15, 1911. Goodwin & Wood, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Hyman, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI