Tolman v. Treat
This text of 106 F. 679 (Tolman v. Treat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above). The written instrument consists of two separable ones, — ra promissory note,.and a clause containing certain provisions as to the entering of judgment thereon in the event of nonpayment. This last, however, does not seem to be a power of attorney, within the meaning of the section relied on. It is what is known as a “warrant of attorney,” and is in fact a retainer, by virtue of which an attorney at law is authorized to appear in court in behalf of a client, and take certain steps as attorney in litigation to which the client is a party. The court is not satisfied, from the text of the act, that congress intended to subject such retainers to the provisions of the stamp tax law Judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 F. 679, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tolman-v-treat-circtsdny-1901.